|
Student Profile Applicant questions for Virgil: How is it working in a low-residency program? The community I've become a part of through Transart is already much more immersive than what I've developed in ten years of living and working as an artist in New York City. I'm developing a collaborative robot project right now with my first mentor, Deborah Aschheim, whom I also exhibited with earlier this Fall. Also, faculty members Mary Ting and Marji Vecchio have both curated my work. The Transart students, directors, and faculty members make up a remarkable body of artists and curators. Could you give any insight into the level of technical expertise of applicants coming into the program, the general "type" of work of appicants that were accepted, etc.? While there are certainly technically savvy people in the program -- including one artist who is building a giant robot -- the majority of students employ technology rather judiciously. And we have painters, sculptors, and performers who don't really do any coding or electronic work at all. Transart is focused on creative and intellectual exploration rather than technological gadgetry for its own sake. Most students are older and quite experienced. Many students are teaching and are already quite accomplished in their fields. I'm not sure if there's a specific type of student, but certainly anyone who is self-driven, passionate about their art and ideas, and curious about the larger context of their work would succeed in the program. How do the critiques go? Given this high-level of expertise among the student body, constructive feedback comes from fellow students as well as faculty members. Critiques are well-structured, concise, and effective in unearthing references and ideas to help students talk about their work from a much wider perspective. Some of Virgil's experiences in the program and his work can be found here. |
||